The need for taking care of devotees is becoming a popular topic of discussion in ISKCON. During the last GBC meetings in Mayapur I have been invited to take part in the GBC sub-committee for devotee care. In our last meeting HH Radhanath Maharaja was requested to give a presentation on the principles the Chowpatty temple in Mumbai, India, applies to develop their community and take care of devotees, with the Counselor System being the main focus. Maharaja's final comment was: "Why re-invent the wheel? You are already so much ahead of us, doing so many wonderful things over there—maybe we should simply apply the same principles everywhere!"
Chowpatty is becoming more and more an example for ideal community development within ISKCON. However, sometimes it is not easy to convince senior devotees of the value of the much discussed and glorified Counselor System. And without full and active support from senior devotees it is rather difficult to put into practise. Often we hear the opinion, "the Bhakti-vriksha Program does the same thing." Some devotees conclude, therefore: "No need for any new systems!"
There are basic differences between these two programs; it is not that one is better than the other. If we analyze them more deeply we discover that they have fundamentally different goals, and that there is plenty of room for both programs to run side by side in a yatra.
Superficially they might appear similar, since the common goal of all programs within Krishna consciousness is to build relationships on the basis of sravanam and kirtanam. As long as we don't have spontaneous attraction and taste to come together and associate on the basis of hearing and chanting, we have to create forums to gradually cultivate this taste.
However, this is only the general purpose of both programs. The main difference is that Bhakti-vriksha preaching focuses on expansion and spreading, whereas the Counselor System aims to 'boil the milk' and 'give substance'.
The Bhakti-vriksha Program accompanies a person through their first eighteen months in Krishna consciousness, bringing them to the level of first initiation. Then the group should divide into new cells, and those initiated devotees can become leaders of the next Bhakti-vriksha groups.
In this way the main emphasis is on spreading and expansion—bringing more and more living entities to the lotus feet of Srila Prabhupada. But what happens to them after initiation? The system is not offering much further support and guidance.
The Counselor System accompanies devotees throughout their whole devotional lives. It addresses the need of each and every devotee for confidential relationships with senior Vaisnavas, where they can find inspiration, support, and guidance. As long as we are in the material world we will always need such relationships in order to provide nourishment to our bhakti lata bijas. It is a basic principle of Vaisnava relationships: accepting dependence on others with similar goals and tastes. Caitanya Mahaprabhu Himself was placing certain ddevotees under the care of others.
The counselor system recognizes that one can give only shelter to others if one has shelter oneself; therefore counselors are advised to have counselor relationships themselves. It also puts great emphasis on equal association—counselors meet regularly among themselves and develop affectionate and confidential relationships on the same principles of sravanam and kirtanam. Association among equals brings subtle anarthas, such as envy, to the surface. In this way the main emphasis of the Counselor System can be described as 'giving substance' and 'boiling the milk.'
In this regard I would like to quote the famous letter Srila Prabhupada wrote to Rupanuga (1972):
"Now I want that we shall concentrate on making our devotees Krishna conscious and ourselves becoming Krishna conscious, and not be so much concerned with expanding ourselves widely but without any spiritual content. Just like boiling the milk, it becomes thicker and sweeter. Now do like that, boil the milk."
Expansion is only meaningful if it is well balanced with giving substance. However, giving substance is always more difficult than expanding. External development is more attractive to the masses, because it gives quick and big results, and it is pleasing to the senses and the ego. Internal development is pleasing to the heart and soul. It requires internal work, and the results are more difficult to assess and long term. Very often the more external mood of expanding is sufforcating the internal mood of giving substance.
Sometimes we find that devotees are extremely enthusiastic, if not to say fanatic, about one particular program at the exclusion of others. In one lecture HH Radhananth Maharaja gave a nice definition of fanaticism: "If our enthusiasm is not guided by higher intelligence than our own, it becomes fanaticism."
Often some material motivation is hiding behind our fanatic enthusiasm for one particular program or system—the motivation for power and control. If a person is the main propagator of one particular system, naturally his power and influence will increase the more devotees he can convince of "his" system. Then he will not be open to other programs, but simply try to bring as many people as possible under his control.
A preacher who has no other motivation than serving and uplifting others will always be open to other programs. He will be able to discover and appreciate their values and goals, able to implement them simultaneously, according to time, place, and circumstance.
Let us put aside our personal ambitions and accept as our real identification being humble servants of the Vaisnavas. Only with such a frame of mind can we act for the benefit and upliftment of the devotees and living entities at large. And only with such a frame of mind will we be able to turn ISKCON into what Srila Prabhupada wanted it to be: Vaikuntha.
Your servant, Devaki dd
Comments
First I have to admit
First I have to admit that, though working for the Congregational Development Ministry, I don't have any experience in Bhakti-vriksha preaching myself; all my 'knowledge' comes from second hand reports, articles, manuals, etc.
That said, I fully agree that the question if Bhakti-vriksha or Counselor System are 'better' doesn't make any sense; it's like asking if apples are better than oranges. In a particular situation one or the other may be useful, or both.
It's also true that the Bhakti-vriksha Program focuses very much on outreach and expansion, bringing as many conditioned souls to Krishna consciousness as humanly possible, while the Counselor System focuses on caring for devotees' spiritual, emotional, and material needs.
What I understand differently, from studying the Bhakti-vriksha Manual and Free to Preach, per example, is that the Bhakti-vriksha process does not stop taking care of devotees after they receive harinama (first) initiation, or after the original cell group divides into two.
According to my understanding, devotees continue in the Bhakti-vriksha environment, and while reaching out to bring new members into their groups is an important part of the program, taking care of each other and developing confidential relationships among themselves is equally important.
Group members are supposed to not only meet during regular meetings, but develop and maintain friendly relationships during all times. There are also meetings of group leaders, and depending on the local cirumstances, devotees will be engaged in temple and other services as well.
In Free to Preach, Prema Padmini Mataji explains how details of group management and leaders' association and relation among each other have been adjusted in Mathuradesh, when problems became obvious.
Similarly, the Counselor System primarily focuses on providing care and support for already existing devotees, but this obviously includes how they are able to perform and increase their service, which often will be some type of outreach, like book distribution, etc.
Which program to choose, or if both should be implemented, depends in my opinion on the particular situation, and also on the preference of the devotees implementing them. None of the programs follow iron-cast rules; both have to be adjusted according to the local circumstances.
Your servant, phanisvara das.
Where does any acarya in our
Where does any acarya in our line speak about this councilor system?
not the words, but the principle
respected prabhu / mataji,
the words "counselor system" may not have been used by our previous acaryas, but the principle of taking care of devotees in an organized manner is not a new one.
srila prabhupada, conversation, paris, july 31, 1976:
... That is the way of Indian teaching, that there is one teacher, and how he's managing hundreds? That means there are groups. One who is elderly student, he's taking some beginners: "Write a or a like this." That he can teach. What he has learned, he can teach. Similarly, next group, next group. So in this way, one teacher can manage hundreds of students of different categories. This is organization. Not that everything I have to do. I cannot teach anybody to do it. That is not intelligence. Intelligence is that employ others to help you. That is intelligence. Not that "Oh, I was busy, I could not do it." Why? What about your assistant? Train assistant so that in your absence things can be done. ... Everyone should be teacher and student.
also srila bhaktivinode thakura and his son, srila bhaktisiddhanta sarasvati thakura, used to organize devotees into groups, the newer ones being cared for by more mature devotees.
ys phani.
From Vijay Venugopal Prabhu
Our experience in BV and CS